Wednesday, June 7, 2017

The Sources of the Sayings of Jesus "Who made me a judge over you?" and "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword" and "I came to send fire on the earth" and "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans"

Chapter III
The Sources of the Gospels and the Way of Writing Them
Section VI
The Texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it
In this section will examine the texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it, as is the case in the previous sections, which I call it Storyline or Plot-story or screenplay of the Gospels, where we will review the most of the events and stories and sayings that mentioned in the Gospels, and comparing them with the Old Testament and with Jesus as was portrayed in the Gospels, and his attributes in the laws of the faith of the churches as well.
This post includes the sources of the following sayings:
The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Who made me a judge over you?"
The Source of the Sayings of Jesus "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword" and "I came to send fire on the earth"
The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans"
The Source of the Saying of Jesus "O faithless and perverse generation"
The Source of the Saying of Jesus "let the dead bury their own dead"
The Source of the Saying of Jesus "But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart"

31 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Who made me a judge over you?"
Luke 12:13 Then one from the crowd said to Him, "Teacher, tell my brother to divide the inheritance with me."
Luke 12:14 But He said to him, "Man, who made Me a judge or an arbitrator over you?"
In this text Luke alone wrote on the lips of Jesus that he said that he is not a judge, which means that he has nothing to do with the LORD in terms of divine attributes and equality, unlike what the churches and the laws of the faith say concerning that he was a god and the son of God and one of three Persons who are one and have the same nature and essence and ability, because here Jesus says that he is not a judge, while there are dozens of texts in the Old Testament declare that the LORD the Creator of the heavens and the earth is the judge, including the following texts:
Deuteronomy 1:17 ‘You shall not show partiality in judgment; you shall hear the small as well as the great; you shall not be afraid in any man’s presence, for the judgment is God’s. The case that is too hard for you, bring to me, and I will hear it’.
Judges 11:27 ‘Therefore I have not sinned against you, but you wronged me by fighting against me. May the LORD, the Judge, render judgment this day between the children of Israel and the people of Ammon’."
1 Samuel 24:12 "Let the LORD judge between you and me, and let the LORD avenge me on you. But my hand shall not be against you.
1 Samuel 24:15 "Therefore let the LORD be judge, and judge between you and me, and see and plead my case, and deliver me out of your hand."
Psalm 7:11 God is a just judge, And God is angry with the wicked every day.
Psalm 9:7 But the LORD shall endure forever; He has prepared His throne for judgment.
Psalm 9:8 He shall judge the world in righteousness, And He shall administer judgment for the peoples in uprightness.
Psalm 58:11 So that men will say, "Surely there is a reward for the righteous; Surely He is God who judges in the earth."
Psalm 75:7 But God is the Judge: He puts down one, And exalts another.
Isaiah 33:22 (For the LORD is our Judge, The LORD is our Lawgiver, The LORD is our King; He will save us);
This contradiction between Luke and the Old Testament indicates that this text is not revelation or inspiration of the Holy Spirit, so from Where Luke quoted this text?
Let's read the following text:
Exodus 2:11 Now it came to pass in those days, when Moses was grown, that he went out to his brethren and looked at their burdens. And he saw an Egyptian beating a Hebrew, one of his brethren.
Exodus 2:12 So he looked this way and that way, and when he saw no one, he killed the Egyptian and hid him in the sand.
Exodus 2:13 And when he went out the second day, behold, two Hebrew men were fighting, and he said to the one who did the wrong, "Why are you striking your companion?"
Exodus 2:14 Then he said, "Who made you a prince and a judge over us? Do you intend to kill me as you killed the Egyptian?" So Moses feared and said, "Surely this thing is known!"
As we read that Luke has quoted the saying of Jesus from the words of the Hebrew man, ignoring that what he wrote contradicts the laws of the faith of the various churches, and what proves my view that Luke had quoted the saying of Jesus from this text is that he had quoted this text and wrote it on the lips of Stephen in Acts of the Apostles, as in the following text:
Act 7:35 "This Moses whom they rejected, saying, ‘Who made you a ruler and a judge’? is the one God sent to be a ruler and a deliverer by the hand of the Angel who appeared to him in the bush.
Despite the fact that this quote is wrong, because Moses at this time has not been sent to them yet, because the LORD will speak with him and sends him after forty years of this event!
Moreover, whom he said to Moses this saying was not a group of people, but one man.
From all this, we see how the Gospels authors have used the Old Testament texts to write their narratives about Jesus in every detail, as is their method and approach of writing the Gospels, as is shown in this book, regardless if they contradict with the Old Testament texts, or with the laws of the faith of the churches, which means that the law "do not accept the lying and false" applies to this saying.

32 - The Source of the Sayings of Jesus "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earthI did not come to bring peace but a swordand "I came to send fire on the earth"
Matthew 10:34 "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword.
Matthew 10:35 "For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’;
Matthew 10:36 "and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household’.
Luke 12:49 "I came to send fire on the earth, and how I wish it were already kindled!
Luke 12:50 "But I have a baptism to be baptized with, and how distressed I am till it is accomplished!
Luke 12:51 "Do you suppose that I came to give peace on earth? I tell you, not at all, but rather division.
Luke 12:52 "For from now on five in one house will be divided: three against two, and two against three.
Luke 12:53 "Father will be divided against son and son against fathermother against daughter and daughter against mothermother-in-law against her daughter-in-law and daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law."
These texts represent a dilemma in the hearts and minds of the good people of the followers of the churches, and a strange understanding which contrasts with the preaching of Jesus; which is based on redemption, love, peace, forgiveness and salvation, as displayed in the Gospels and as say the various churches, which indicates that these texts have not been written through the revelation or the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or even through the same source, because Matthew and Luke did not write the same words, but through the method and approach of writing the Gospels, as is shown in this book. So what are the sources of these texts?
As for the sayings "Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth, I did not come to bring peace but a sword" and "I came to send fire on the earth"; there are dozens of texts that talked about the sword of God and about the fire, which had been sent by the LORD, or He will send it, including the following texts:
Psalm 78:62 He also gave His people over to the sword, And was furious with His inheritance.
Psalm 78:63 The fire consumed their young men, And their maidens were not given in marriage.
Psalm 97:3 A fire goes before Him, And burns up His enemies round about.
Ezekiel 30:8 Then they will know that am the LORD, When I have set a fire in Egypt And all her helpers are destroyed.
Ezekiel 39:6 "And I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in security in the coastlands. Then they shall know that I am the LORD.
Ezekiel 39:7 "So I will make My holy name known in the midst of My people Israel, and I will not let them profane My holy name anymore. Then the nations shall know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.
Ezekiel 39:8 "Surely it is coming, and it shall be done," says the Lord GOD. "This is the day of which I have spoken.
Hosea 8:14 "For Israel has forgotten his Maker, And has built temples; Judah also has multiplied fortified cities; But I will send fire upon his cities, And it shall devour his palaces."
Amos 1:4 But I will send a fire into the house of Hazael, Which shall devour the palaces of Ben-Hadad.
Amos 1:7 But I will send a fire upon the wall of Gaza, Which shall devour its palaces.
Amos 1:10 But I will send a fire upon the wall of Tyre, Which shall devour its palaces."
Amos 1:12 But I will send a fire upon Teman, Which shall devour the palaces of Bozrah."
Amos 2:2 But I will send a fire upon Moab, And it shall devour the palaces of Kerioth; Moab shall die with tumult, With shouting and trumpet sound. 
Amos 2:5 But I will send a fire upon Judah, And it shall devour the palaces of Jerusalem."
Psalm 78:61 And delivered His strength into captivity, And His glory into the enemy’s hand.
Psalm 78:62 He also gave His people over to the sword, And was furious with His inheritance.
Isaiah 34:5 "For My sword shall be bathed in heaven; Indeed it shall come down on Edom, And on the people of My curse, for judgment.
Isaiah 34:6 The sword of the LORD is filled with blood, It is made overflowing with fatness, With the blood of lambs and goats, With the fat of the kidneys of rams. For the LORD has a sacrifice in Bozrah, And a great slaughter in the land of Edom.
Isaiah 66:16 For by fire and by His sword The LORD will judge all flesh; And the slain of the LORD shall be many.
Jeremiah 9:15 therefore thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: "Behold, I will feed them, this people, with wormwood, and give them water of gall to drink.
Jeremiah 9:16 "I will scatter them also among the Gentiles, whom neither they nor their fathers have known. And I will send a sword after them until I have consumed them."
Jeremiah 12:12 The plunderers have come On all the desolate heights in the wilderness, For the sword of the LORD shall devour From one end of the land to the other end of the land; No flesh shall have peace.
Jeremiah 25:16 "And they will drink and stagger and go mad because of the sword that I will send among them."
Jeremiah 25:27 "Therefore you shall say to them, ‘Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: "Drink, be drunk, and vomit! Fall and rise no more, because of the sword which I will send among you."‘
Jeremiah 25:29 "For behold, I begin to bring calamity on the city which is called by My name, and should you be utterly unpunished? You shall not be unpunished, for I will call for a sword on all the inhabitants of the earth," says the LORD of hosts’.
Ezekiel 6:3 "and say, ‘O mountains of Israel, hear the word of the Lord GOD’! Thus says the Lord GOD to the mountains, to the hills, to the ravines, and to the valleys: "Indeed I, even I, will bring a sword against you, and I will destroy your high places.
Ezekiel 21:4 "Because I will cut off both righteous and wicked from you, therefore My sword shall go out of its sheath against all flesh from south to north,
As for the source of the rest of the texts of Matthew and Luke, let's read the following text:
Micah 7:5 Do not trust in a friend; Do not put your confidence in a companion; Guard the doors of your mouth From her who lies in your bosom.
Micah 7:6 For son dishonors fatherDaughter rises against her motherDaughter-in-law against her mother-in-law; A man’s enemies are the men of his own household.
As we read that the text in the book of Micah is almost the same as the text that mentioned in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke, despite they must be aware that this notion inconsistent with what they have written about Jesus and his calling for peace, tolerance, love and forgiveness!

33 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Do not go into the way of the Gentilesand do not enter a city of the Samaritans"
Matthew 10:5 These twelve Jesus sent out and commanded them, saying: "Do not go into the way of the Gentiles, and do not enter a city of the Samaritans.
Matthew 10:6 "But go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.
This text with the text that talks about sending Jesus only to the children of Israel, which is as follows:
Matthew 15:23 But He answered her not a word. And His disciples came and urged Him, saying, "Send her away, for she cries out after us."
Matthew 15:24 But He answered and said, "I was not sent except to the lost sheep of the house of Israel."
Are considered one of the most major problematic issues in the hearts and minds of the good people of the followers of the churches, because they contradict what is written in the Gospel of John about his visit to a city of Samaria that called Sychar, (John 4:1-43).
Moreover, that all of them are not of the children of Israel, which means that they are not followers of Jesus, if so, this indicates that this text has not been written by the revelation or the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, but through the method and approach of writing the Gospels, as is shown in this book, therefore what is the source of this text?
Let's read the following text:
Jeremiah 10:1 Hear the word which the LORD speaks to you, O house of Israel.
Jeremiah 10:2 Thus says the LORD: "Do not learn the way of the Gentiles; Do not be dismayed at the signs of heaven, For the Gentiles are dismayed at them.
As we read that the LORD asked the children of Israel not to learn the way of the Gentiles, which is similar to what is written by Matthew, but he wrote his text as a real way or a physical way, which made him contrasts with John!

34 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "O faithless and perverse generation"
Matthew 17:14 And when they had come to the multitude, a man came to Him, kneeling down to Him and saying,
Matthew 17:15 "Lord, have mercy on my son, for he is an epileptic and suffers severely; for he often falls into the fire and often into the water.
Matthew 17:16 "So I brought him to Your disciples, but they could not cure him."
Matthew 17:17 Then Jesus answered and said, "O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you? How long shall I bear with you? Bring him here to Me."
Matthew 17:18 And Jesus rebuked the demon, and it came out of him; and the child was cured from that very hour.
Matthew 17:19 Then the disciples came to Jesus privately and said, "Why could we not cast it out?"
Matthew 17:20 So Jesus said to them"Because of your unbelief; for assuredly, I say to you, if you have faith as a mustard seed, you will say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there’, and it will move; and nothing will be impossible for you.
Matthew 17:21 "However, this kind does not go out except by prayer and fasting."
Luke 9:37 Now it happened on the next day, when they had come down from the mountain, that a great multitude met Him.
Luke 9:38 Suddenly a man from the multitude cried out, saying, "Teacher, I implore You, look on my son, for he is my only child.
Luke 9:39 "And behold, a spirit seizes him, and he suddenly cries out; it convulses him so that he foams at the mouth, and it departs from him with great difficulty, bruising him.
Luke 9:40 "So I implored Your disciples to cast it out, but they could not."
Luke 9:41 Then Jesus answered and said, "O faithless and perverse generation, how long shall I be with you and bear with you? Bring your son here."
Luke 9:42 And as he was still coming, the demon threw him down and convulsed him. Then Jesus rebuked the unclean spirit, healed the childand gave him back to his father.
These two texts represented a dilemma in the Gospels; not only because they have described the disciples as a faithless, which is indeed their reality as it is written in the Gospels, but because they could not cure the child and cast the demon out of him, while Matthew and Luke wrote before this story that Jesus had given them power and authority over all demons to cast them out, as in the following texts:
Matthew 10:1 And when He had called His twelve disciples to HimHe gave them power over unclean spiritsto cast them out, and to heal all kinds of sickness and all kinds of disease.
Luke 9:1 Then He called His twelve disciples together and gave them power and authority over all demons, and to cure diseases.
Luke 9:2 He sent them to preach the kingdom of God and to heal the sick.
And this proves that the word of Jesus is not true and unachievable, and this unlike the words of the Lord the Creator of the heavens and the earth, as is shown in the first chapter, which indicates that this story is not a revelation or an inspiration of the Holy Spirit, and what matters here is what is the source of the saying "faithless and perverse generation"?
Let's read the following text:
Deuteronomy 32:3 For I proclaim the name of the LORD: Ascribe greatness to our God.
Deuteronomy 32:4 He is the Rock, His work is perfect; For all His ways are justice, A God of truth and without injustice; Righteous and upright is He.
Deuteronomy 32:5 "They have corrupted themselves; They are not His children, Because of their blemish: A perverse and crooked generation.
Deuteronomy 32:6 Do you thus deal with the LORD, O foolish and unwise people? Is He not your Father, who bought you? Has He not made you and established you?
This text is part of the Song of Moses, which he had said at the end of his life, and describes the children of Israel that they are a perverse and crooked generation, and this description is true, because they did a lot of troubles to Moses, even though they had seen a lot of miracles, as is written in the Old Testament, while what Matthew and Luke have written on the lips of Jesus that he says that his disciples is a faithless and perverse generation proves that his words in the previous texts about giving his disciples the power over unclean spirits to cast them out have not been achieved!

35 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "let the dead bury their own dead"
Matthew 8:21 Then another of His disciples said to Him, "Lord, let me first go and bury my father."
Matthew 8:22 But Jesus said to him, "Follow Me, and let the dead bury their own dead."
Luke 9:59 Then He said to another, "Follow Me." But he said, "Lord, let me first go and bury my father."
Luke 9:60 Jesus said to him, "Let the dead bury their own dead, but you go and preach the kingdom of God."
Anyone who reads these texts feels sad, because how dare Matthew and Luke to write about the hardness of Jesus' heart; who prevented his disciple to bury his father on the flimsy and false pretext, and contradictory as well, saying let the dead bury their own dead and go and preach the kingdom of God, because this disciple could have preached the kingdom of God among his family and his peoples, and there is no moment for preaching the Kingdom of God better than the moment which the human beings facing death, so this disciple was able to preach the Kingdom of God and at the same time contributes to bury his father.
For this, I can say that this text is not a revelation or inspiration of the Holy Spirit, but it was written according to the method and approach of writing the Gospels, as is shown in this book, so from Where Matthew and Luke have quoted this text, and wrote it on the lips of Jesus?
Let's read the following text:
1Kings 19:19 So he departed from there, and found Elisha the son of Shaphat, who was plowing with twelve yoke of oxen before him, and he was with the twelfth. Then Elijah passed by him and threw his mantle on him.
1Kings 19:20 And he left the oxen and ran after Elijah, and said, "Please let me kiss my father and my mother, and then I will follow you." And he said to him, "Go back again, for what have I done to you?"
1Kings 19:21 So Elisha turned back from him, and took a yoke of oxen and slaughtered them and boiled their flesh, using the oxen’s equipment, and gave it to the people, and they ate. Then he arose and followed Elijah, and became his servant.
The existence of this story in the Old Testament; made Matthew and Luke compose this story about Jesus, but unlike the story of Elijah and Elisha, as we read, because when Elisha asked Elijah to let him to kiss his father and his mother then he will follow him; Elijah did not say anything to him, such as "you should not kiss the dead" or that your father and mother do not deserve the kiss, but allowed him and said to him "go back again", so Elisha turned back from him, and took a yoke of oxen and slaughtered them and boiled their flesh, and gave it to the people, and they ate, then he arose and followed Elijah, and became his servant.
For this I say that the method and the approach of the Gospels authors in writing the Gospels, which is the quoting the stories and the texts of the Old Testament and reformulating them in the Gospels, regardless of the true meaning or the reality of those stories and texts, is the main reason of all the errors and contradictions and unacceptable sayings that we read in the Gospels!

36 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart"
Matthew 5:27 "You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not commit adultery’.
Matthew 5:28 "But I say to you that whoever looks at a woman to lust for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
This text is one of the beautiful texts that written by Matthew on the lips of Jesus, but it is not far away from the method and approach of the Gospels authors in writing the Gospels, which is the quoting from the texts of the Old Testament and reformulating them in their narratives about Jesus to make similarity with the Old Testament to say that they are from the same source, as shown in this book, including this text, which is similar to two texts in the Old Testament, which are as follows:
Exodus 20:17 "You shall not covet your neighbor’s house; you shall not covet your neighbor’s wife, nor his male servant, nor his female servant, nor his ox, nor his donkey, nor anything that is your neighbor’s."
Proverbs 6:25 Do not lust after her beauty in your heart, Nor let her allure you with her eyelids.
We can see the similarity between the texts of the Old Testament and Matthew's text, and this appears in the most of teachings of Jesus in the Gospels, because either they are on the contrary of them, or violated the commandments of the Law, or added to them, or they are themselves! For this I say that most of the stories and the texts of the Gospels can be read from the Old Testament, with one difference, in fact a huge difference, which is that the Old Testament calls to worship the Lord the true God alone, the Creator of the heavens and the earth, while the Gospels call to worship three gods with the LORD or beside Him, and that is why it contains all these contradictions and discrepancies and errors and differences.

The Source of the Story of Jesus sleeping in the Ship

Chapter III
The Sources of the Gospels and the Way of Writing Them
Section VI
The Texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it
In this section will examine the texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it, as is the case in the previous sections, which I call it Storyline or Plot-story or screenplay of the Gospels, where we will review the most of the events and stories and sayings that mentioned in the Gospels, and comparing them with the Old Testament and with Jesus as was portrayed in the Gospels, and his attributes in the laws of the faith of the churches as well.
37 - The Source of the Story of Jesus sleeping in the Ship
Matthew 8:23 Now when He got into a boat, His disciples followed Him.
Matthew 8:24 And suddenly a great tempest arose on the sea, so that the boat was covered with the waves. But He was asleep.
Matthew 8:25 Then His disciples came to Him and awoke Him, saying, "Lord, save us! We are perishing!"
Matthew 8:26 But He said to them, "Why are you fearful, O you of little faith?" Then He arose and rebuked the winds and the sea, and there was a great calm.
Matthew 8:27 So the men marveled, saying, "Who can this be, that even the winds and the sea obey Him?"
Mark 4:36 Now when they had left the multitude, they took Him along in the boat as He was. And other little boats were also with Him.
Mark 4:37 And a great windstorm arose, and the waves beat into the boat, so that it was already filling.
Mark 4:38 But He was in the stern, asleep on a pillow. And they awoke Him and said to Him, "Teacher, do You not care that we are perishing?"
Mark 4:39 Then He arose and rebuked the wind, and said to the sea, "Peace, be still!" And the wind ceased and there was a great calm.
Mark 4:40 But He said to them"Why are you so fearful? How is it that you have no faith?"
Mark 4:41 And they feared exceedingly, and said to one another, "Who can this be, that even the wind and the sea obey Him!"
Luke 8:22 Now it happened, on a certain day, that He got into a boat with His disciples. And He said to them, "Let us cross over to the other side of the lake." And they launched out.
Luke 8:23 But as they sailed He fell asleep. And a windstorm came down on the lake, and they were filling with water, and were in jeopardy.
Luke 8:24 And they came to Him and awoke Him, saying, "Master, Master, we are perishing!" Then He arose and rebuked the wind and the raging of the water. And they ceased, and there was a calm.
Luke 8:25 But He said to them"Where is your faith?" And they were afraid, and marveled, saying to one another, "Who can this be? For He commands even the winds and water, and they obey Him!"
These texts talk about the story of Jesus calming the storm, which contains a lot of contradictions with the laws of faith of the various churches, or that those laws contradict it; that say that Jesus is a god and the son of God and one of the three Persons who are one and have the same nature and essence, because it says that Jesus was asleep, and in the text of Mark he was asleep on a pillow, and the sleeping is not one of the attributes of the LORD the Creator of the heavens and the earth, as said Elijah on Baal when he slaughtered the prophets of Baal, as it is written in the Old Testament.
1Kings 18:27 And so it was, at noon, that Elijah mocked them and said, "Cry aloud, for he is a god; either he is meditating, or he is busy, or he is on a journey, or perhaps he is sleeping and must be awakened." .
Moreover, these texts also contradict the attributes of the Lord the God who is not a man or the son of man, and does not dwell on the earth with men nor sleep, because heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain Him, as in the following texts:
Psalm 121:4 Behold, He who keeps Israel Shall neither slumber nor sleep.
2 Chronicles 6:18 "But will God indeed dwell with men on the earthBehold, heaven and the heaven of heavens cannot contain You. How much less this temple which I have built!  
Furthermore, they have described the disciples that they have no faith, so if the disciples have no faith, who is the person who has Faith among the followers of the various churches?!
From all this, I can say that this story is quoted from the Old Testament as is the method and approach of writing the Gospels, as is shown in this book, so what is the source of this story?
Let's read the following text:
Jonah 1:4 But the LORD sent out a great wind on the sea, and there was a mighty tempest on the sea, so that the ship was about to be broken up.
Jonah 1:5 Then the mariners were afraid; and every man cried out to his god, and threw the cargo that was in the ship into the sea, to lighten the load. But Jonah had gone down into the lowest parts of the ship, had lain down, and was fast asleep.
Jonah 1:6 So the captain came to him, and said to him, "What do you mean, sleeperArise, call on your God; perhaps your God will consider us, so that we may not perish."
In this text we read part of the story of Jonah on the ship, and if we look closely in the paragraphs; we could see the Gospels authors when they wrote this story and reformulated in their narratives about Jesus, even though they say that he was a god and the son of God, and he describes the disciples that they have no faith!
Moreover, Matthew had also quoted from this story the period of staying of Jesus in the tomb, (Matthew 12:39-49), which is inconsistent with what is written in the Gospels about the time period of his stay in the tomb, as is well-known.
So, we conclude that this story is not true, and the law "do not accept the lying and false" applies to this story.

The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man"

Chapter III
The Sources of the Gospels and the Way of Writing Them
Section VI
The Texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it
In this section will examine the texts which were quoted from the Old Testament, but they have not been attributed directly to it, as is the case in the previous sections, which I call it Storyline or Plot-story or screenplay of the Gospels, where we will review the most of the events and stories and sayings that mentioned in the Gospels, and comparing them with the Old Testament and with Jesus as was portrayed in the Gospels, and his attributes in the laws of the faith of the churches as well.
38 - The Source of the Saying of Jesus "Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man"
John 1:43 The following day Jesus wanted to go to Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him, "Follow Me."
John 1:44 Now Philip was from Bethsaida, the city of Andrew and Peter.
John 1:45 Philip found Nathanael and said to him, "We have found Him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote — Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph."
John 1:46 And Nathanael said to him, "Can anything good come out of Nazareth?" Philip said to him, "Come and see."
John 1:47 Jesus saw Nathanael coming toward Him, and said of him, "Behold, an Israelite indeed, in whom is no deceit!"
John 1:48 Nathanael said to Him, "How do You know me?" Jesus answered and said to him, "Before Philip called you, when you were under the fig tree, I saw you."
John 1:49 Nathanael answered and said to Him, "Rabbi, You are the Son of God! You are the King of Israel!"
John 1:50 Jesus answered and said to him, "Because I said to you, ‘I saw you under the fig tree’, do you believe? You will see greater things than these."
John 1:51 And He said to him, "Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man."
This text is part of the story of the beginning of preaching of Jesus that written by John, and we notice that it contains several errors and contradictions with the other Gospels, including the following:
The first is the writing on the lips of Philip that he said "We have found him of whom Moses in the law, and also the prophets, wrote Jesus of Nazareth, the son of Joseph", this saying is wrong, because there is no any text in the Old Testament mentions Jesus by name!
The second is that he said Jesus the son of Joseph, and this is contradict what the various churches say that Jesus was born of Mary without intervention of a biological father, as is well-known.
The third is that this story contradicts the story of the beginning of Jesus' preaching in the other Gospels, because John wrote that Jesus began preaching when John the Baptist was outside the prison, while the other Gospels authors wrote that Jesus began preaching after he has been arrested, as in the following texts:
Matthew 4:12 Now when Jesus heard that John had been put in prison, He departed to Galilee.
Matthew 4:13 And leaving Nazareth, He came and dwelt in Capernaum, which is by the sea, in the regions of Zebulun and Naphtali,
Mark 1:14 Now after John was put in prison, Jesus came to Galilee, preaching the gospel of the kingdom of God,
John 1:35 Again, the next day, John stood with two of his disciples.
John 1:36 And looking at Jesus as He walked, he said, "Behold the Lamb of God!"
John 1:37 The two disciples heard him speak, and they followed Jesus.
John 1:38 Then Jesus turned, and seeing them following, said to them, "What do you seek? " They said to Him, "Rabbi" (which is to say, when translated, Teacher), "where are You staying?"
John 1:39 He said to them, "Come and see." They came and saw where He was staying, and remained with Him that day (now it was about the tenth hour).
John 1:40 One of the two who heard John speak, and followed Him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother.
John 1:41 He first found his own brother Simon, and said to him, "We have found the Messiah" (which is translated, the Christ).
John 1:42 And he brought him to Jesus. Now when Jesus looked at him, He said, "You are Simon the son of Jonah. You shall be called Cephas" (which is translated, A Stone).
John 1:43 The following day Jesus wanted to go to Galilee, and He found Philip and said to him, "Follow Me."
All these things confirm that this story is not true, especially the saying "Most assuredly, I say to you, hereafter you shall see heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of Man", because the Gospels did not mention that anyone has seen heaven open, and the angels of God ascending and descending upon Jesus!
Even the text that was written by John himself about hearing a voice from heaven did not say that heaven was open, as well as Luke who said that an angel from heaven has appeared to Jesus, did not write that heaven was open, as in the following texts:
John 12:27 "Now My soul is troubled, and what shall I say? ‘Father, save Me from this hour’? But for this purpose I came to this hour.
John 12:28 "Father, glorify Your name." Then a voice came from heavensaying, "I have both glorified it and will glorify it again."
John 12:29 Therefore the people who stood by and heard it said that it had thundered. Others said, "An angel has spoken to Him."
Luke 22:43 Then an angel appeared to Him from heaven, strengthening Him.
Luke 22:44 And being in agony, He prayed more earnestly. Then His sweat became like great drops of blood falling down to the ground.
Luke 22:45 When He rose up from prayer, and had come to His disciples, He found them sleeping from sorrow.
And this indicates that this saying has not been achieved, which means that it is not a revelation or inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or even it was written through seeing the real story of Jesus or hearing it from a reliable source, but it is written through their method and approach of writing the Gospels, which is the quoting from the texts of the Old Testament and reformulating them in the narratives about Jesus to bestow a state of holiness and credibility and reliability on the Gospels, as is shown in this book, so what is the source of this saying?
In fact, there are several texts in the Old Testament talking about the ascending and descending of the angels and open the heaven, including the following text:
Genesis 28:10 Now Jacob went out from Beersheba and went toward Haran.
Genesis 28:11 So he came to a certain place and stayed there all night, because the sun had set. And he took one of the stones of that place and put it at his head, and he lay down in that place to sleep.
Genesis 28:12 Then he dreamed, and behold, a ladder was set up on the earth, and its top reached to heaven; and there the angels of God were ascending and descending on it.
This text is a dream of Jacob, and no one could object to the dreams or criticizes them, because anyone can say that he dreamed of dreams about anything without causing any disputes by anyone in its content, but what has been written by John on the lips of Jesus which containing the contradictions and errors that mentioned above was talking about seeing heaven open, and the angels descend and ascend upon Jesus in the physical reality, not in dreams, which did not happen; and the Gospels authors did not mention it, which indicates that this story has not been written through a revelation or inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or even through a trusted source, which means that our law "do not accept the lying and false" applies to this story.

The Epilogue of the Book of the Gospel Sources

Conclusion
Now, and after this detailed and thorough and in-depth study of most texts and stories and sayings of the four Gospels, and the relationship between them and the Old Testament, both in the principles and concepts of it, and the texts that have been quoted from it, whether direct or indirect or cited during dialogues. And the exact meaning of the word "gospel" in the New Testament, and the way of preaching of the disciples, and the method and approach and the purpose of writing the Gospels, it's time to summarize the results that we have reached.
The first is that there is no any kind of relationship or connection in terms of principles and sources between the authors of the Gospels in particular, and the rest of the New Testament authors generally, and the Old Testament except one thing which is the quoted texts, because, as we have read, the Old Testament is based on the Oneness of the LORD the Creator of the heavens and earth, while the New Testament was based on the multiplicity of gods and trinity! And this is the case with the rest of Principles.
As for the quoted texts, none of them applies to Jesus or his time or his contemporary generation, knowing they have distorted and twisted and manipulated most of them, and so on, as we have seen, and all this they have done just to bestow a state of holiness and reliability and credibility on what they have written.
The second is that the true meaning of the term or the word "gospel" is the way of preaching Jesus through the Old Testament texts to convince the Jews especially and the other peoples generally that he is the Christ who was mentioned in the Old Testament texts, and not intended the Four Gospels. Otherwise, the churches should explain and justify why they did not keep the Gospels of Paul and Peter which have been mentioned in the Letters of Paul.
The third is that the four Gospels have not been written through the revelation or the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, as say the churches to their pious followers.
The fourth is that the four Gospels have not been written by the eyewitnesses, who have really seen the story of Jesus or heard it from reliable sources, as the churches claim.
The fifth is that the four Gospels had been written through a certain approach and a certain way, which is the quoting from the texts of the Old Testament and reformulating them in the framework of the narrative to say that the four Gospels are considered as achieving and fulfilling the prophecies of the Old Testament and from the same source away from the real story of the Christ!
Further evidence that proves the results of the book, which have not been discussed in detail in the book, which are as follows:
The first is that the writing of the Gospels after decades of Jesus' ascension to heaven; this period of time was necessary to study the texts of the Old Testament and reformulating them in the context of narrative in the Gospels, and that's what we notice in Paul's Letters for they have been written before decades of writing the four Gospels. Although he had quoted dozens of texts from the Old Testament, yet he did not talk about Jesus' life, except few stories, which some of them are similar to what is written in the four Gospels, and the others inconsistent with what is written in them, and did not write any word on the lips of Jesus except one or two, as well as the disciples as is written in Acts of the Apostles about them, and in their letters, as is shown previously.
However, this period of time was not enough to write the four Gospels without errors and contradictions, for this we find that some of the texts were added to them, and deleted, and reformed some others of them, hence, there is no manuscript is similar to other, even the modern translations differ from each other.
The second is the eagerness of the Gospels authors to make similarity between what they have written and the Old Testament not only in the stories and texts but in wording and phrasing the paragraphs to suggest that what they have written is from the same source of the Old Testament! Below very few of them:
Matthew 1:25 and did not know her till she had brought forth her firstborn Son. And he called His name JESUS.
Genesis 38:26 So Judah acknowledged them and said, "She has been more righteous than I, because I did not give her to Shelah my son." And he never knew her again.
1 Kings 1:4 The young woman was very lovely; and she cared for the king, and served him; but the king did not know her.

Luke 1:46 And Mary said: "My soul magnifies the Lord,
Luke 1:47 And my spirit has rejoiced in God my Savior.
Habakkuk 3:18 Yet I will rejoice in the LORD, I will joy in the God of my salvation.

Luke 1:48 For He has regarded the lowly state of His maidservant; For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed.
Psalm 72:17 His name shall endure forever; His name shall continue as long as the sun. And men shall be blessed in Him; All nations shall call Him blessed.

Luke 1:25 "Thus the Lord has dealt with me, in the days when He looked on meto take away my reproach among people."
Genesis 30:22 Then God remembered Rachel, and God listened to her and opened her womb.
Genesis 30:23 And she conceived and bore a son, and said, "God has taken away my reproach."

Luke 1:38 Then Mary said, "Behold the maidservant of the Lord! Let it be to me according to your word." And the angel departed from her.
Genesis 30:34 And Laban said, "Oh, that it were according to your word!"
Luke 1:42 Then she spoke out with a loud voice and said, "Blessed are you among women, and blessed is the fruit of your womb!
Deuteronomy 28:4 "Blessed shall be the fruit of your body, the produce of your ground and the increase of your herds, the increase of your cattle and the offspring of your flocks.

Luke 2:19 But Mary kept all these things and pondered them in her heart.
Luke 2:51 Then He went down with them and came to Nazareth, and was subject to them, but His mother kept all these things in her heart.
Genesis 37:11 And his brothers envied him, but his father kept the matter in mind.

John 7:37 On the last day, that great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, "If anyone thirsts, let him come to Me and drink.
Isaiah 55:1 "Ho! Everyone who thirstsCome to the waters; And you who have no money, Come, buy and eat. Yes, come, buy wine and milk Without money and without price.

John 4:37 "For in this the saying is true: ‘One sows and another reaps’.
Job 31:8 Then let me sowand another eat; Yes, let my harvest be rooted out.
The third is the failure to identify exactly who are the Gospels authors.
The fourth is that there are no original manuscripts of the Gospels, and the oldest full manuscripts which are available dating back to the fourth century A.D, such as Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus and Codex Alexandrinus.
The fifth is a controversy and dispute that has occurred over the centuries until now among the fathers of the churches on the legality and canonical and authoritative of some of the texts and paragraphs and letters of the New Testament.
The sixth is that the Church was forced to hold the Councils to write the laws to protect the Gospel of criticism, and established the Inquisition, which has cost the humanity millions of victims in the past centuries.
The seventh is, as we have read previously, that the one who has declared that he has gospel which he has received it by revelation from Jesus, (Galatians 1:11-12), i.e., Paul, this gospel has been lost, and the churches did not keep it!
The eighth is that all the non-canonical Gospels talk about Jesus as a Christ and a god and the son of God, and he is crucified and died and was buried and rose from the dead, which indicates that their authors believe in Jesus as what the churches believe in him one way or another. And they wrote their gospels based on their understanding and interpretation of the Old Testament texts as did the four Gospels authors, but they were unable to compose integrated stories, or provide coherent accounts, as the four writers did! Now apart from all the contradictions and discrepancies and errors that contained in the four Gospels as is well known, and as we have read in this book. For example, the Gospel of Thomas which contains one hundred and fourteen paragraphs; which looks like Excerpts not an integrated story; for this the churches have refused them to unite the hearts and minds of their followers on the four Gospels only, even though the errors and the contradictions and discrepancies contained therein.
All this confirms that the Gospels have not been written by the revelation or the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or even through seeing the real story of the Christ, or hearing it from reliable sources, but have been written through quoting the Old Testament texts and reformulating them in accounts to talk about the life of Christ, the son of Mary, according to what the Churches believe in the attributes of Jesus, and here I'd like to remind once again that we need more knowledge and information more than is now available about the sects that existed in the first centuries, such as the Arians and others, to know the reality of what they were believed in Christ the son of Mary.
Finally, I'd like to mention a text of Hosea to be a sign to all those who are looking for the truth, which is as follows:
Hosea 14:9 Who is wiseLet him understand these thingsWho is prudent? Let him know them. For the ways of the LORD are rightThe righteous walk in them, But transgressors stumble in them.

Nader Isa

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Introduction to the book of the Gospel Sources

Introduction
This book is a new attempt, hopefully to be the last, in the search for the sources which were relied upon by the Gospel authors to compose the Gospels.
Despite many attempts and efforts by scholars and researchers to detect the sources of the Gospels over the past centuries, they are unable to reach a decisive conclusion in determining their sources, due to several factors, such as, the loss of the original manuscripts, the ignorance of the history of their authors, the ignorance of the exact date of writing them, the lack of understanding of the purpose of their writing and the way and the approach of writing, as well as the Lack of thorough understanding of the relationship between them and the Old Testament, both in texts or principles and concepts, and finally the lack of knowledge about the sects whom have believed in Christ as a prophet and messenger, not as a god and the son of God, such as the Arians and others.
Because of this, I endeavored in this book to overcome many of these factors, and relied in the detection of these sources through search in the relationship between the Old Testament and the Gospels, both in the principles and concepts of the Old Testament and the texts which had been quoted in the Gospels by the authors.
Also, I studied the meaning of the word Gospel, and the way of writing the Gospels, to solve the question of how they had been written, if it was through the revelation and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, or it was written for a particular purpose, away from the revelation and the Holy Spirit.
The book is divided into five sections, a preface, three chapters and a conclusion.
In the preface, I have briefly reviewed a part of the history of the Gospels and the most famous theories and scholars that have searched for the gospels sources, and I mentioned some of the newly discovered Gospels.
In the first chapter, I explained the most important principles and concepts of the Old Testament and compared them with the principles and concepts of the Gospels.
In the second chapter, I studied the meaning of the word gospel and the purpose of the Gospels authors to write them. Also showed the existence of several lost gospels, which had been preached by the Apostles and the disciples.
In the third chapter, I showed the way of writing the Gospels, as well as I studied the texts of the Old Testament that were quoted by the Gospels authors; given the numerous of texts and the variety of ways of citation, it was divided into several sections, as shown below:
In the first section, I showed several texts in the Gospels that have been attributed to the Old Testament, while they are not written in it.
In the second section, I showed some texts in the Gospels that have been attributed to some books of the Old Testament, yet they are written in other books.
In the third section, I showed some texts in the Gospels contain some names and numbers that inconsistent with what is written in the Old Testament.
In the fourth section, I studied the texts which have been attributed directly to the Old Testament, and compared them with the texts of the Old Testament, to find out the reality of those texts, and if they were fulfilled in Jesus and his time and his generation or not.
In the fifth section, I studied the texts, which were cited from the Old Testament during some dialogues and discussions and arguments that took place between the figures of the New Testament, whether Jesus or the Jews or even the devil.
In the sixth section, I studied the texts which were not attributed directly to the Old Testament, but were quoted from it, and compared them with the texts of the Old Testament to find out the reliability, credibility and reality of them, and if they were talking about Jesus or not.
And finally, a conclusion that summarizes the book's findings.

Nader Isa

Preface of the Book of the Gospel Sources

Preface
The four Gospels are the foundation which the various churches have established their faith upon, and at the same time, are considered one of the most important problems that faced the churches during its long history, in addition to the problems already existing in the four Gospels, whether about the attributes of Jesus and the attributes of his father and the Holy Spirit, or the contradiction with the attributes of the Lord, the only true God the Creator of heavens and earth that mentioned in the Old Testament, or the inconsistencies and differences between the stories which they have mentioned, both in the historical events, or in the same stories themselves; from the genealogy of Jesus to the entry of Jesus into Jerusalem riding on a donkey and colt, his trial, crucifixion, resurrection, and finally his appearance to the disciples, which led to the occurrence of all schisms among the churches, as is well known to all.
As well as, the four Gospels are anonymous, and they have been written after a long period of the time of the ascension of Jesus to the heaven, and there are many theories and sayings to set this period; this means that the disciples were not preaching by the four Gospels!
Also they have not been written by the order of Jesus, as is the case with the Pentateuch; which are if they have not been written by Moses himself, as many researchers and scholars say, yet there are several texts that recommend the children of Israel to write it and keep it.
Moreover, we do not have the original manuscripts of the four Gospels, and the existing manuscripts contain a lot of errors and differences between them, both in the language or in the texts, i.e., there are some paragraphs in some manuscripts which are lost in the other manuscripts, such as the epilogue of the Gospel of Mark, (16 : 9 - 20), etc., or having some paragraphs in some manuscripts indicating to the explanation and interpretation of other paragraphs, while they had been written in other manuscripts as original paragraphs, etc.
For this, the churches have not been seeking to translate the Gospels to the local languages that are spoken by the Peoples, even the Coptic Orthodox Church, until now, does not allow to translate the Gospels to the Arabic language that is spoken by the Copts.
Furthermore, the Catholic church has killed dozens of people on charges of translation the Gospels and interpretation them, because they did not agree with its faith, and Will Durant had mentioned in his book The Story of Civilization that the church had killed twenty men and women in one day on this charge, as well as the Catholic Church had burned the bones of John Wycliffe after forty years of his death because he had translated the Gospels to the English language, because they could not kill him when was still alive!
Despite all these precautions of the churches, yet they were unable to stop the human mind for seeking the freedom of thinking and discussing all issues, including the characteristics of Jesus and his divinity, or the Gospels themselves, and the history tells us about dozens of the fathers of the church who were believing in what the churches said about the divine attributes of Jesus, yet they did not accept what the churches say about the Gospels and the New Testament of words and laws, as what Eusebius Pamphilius mentioned in his book Church History, died in 340 AD, as well as the Syriac Church has a New Testament, which is called The Peshitta i.e., the simple version, which does not include Peter II and III, and John III, and the Revelation and the Epistle of Jude.
And then Martin Luther has removed seven books from the Old Testament; the Book of Tobit, Judith, the sequel Book of Esther, The Wisdom, Ecclesiasticus, Baruch, the sequel Book of Daniel and the Maccabees I and II, and he has relied upon the Old Testament, which is rolling among the Jews, i.e., Hebrew Version, and had removed the Acts of the Apostles and the Revelation and James, but he backed down on this later.
And after the end of the Church control in Europe, and the occupation of Constantinople and the communication between the East and the West later, which has already led to discover dozens of manuscripts, that have not been seen or read before; the talk started again about the sources of the Gospels and their reality and their credibility and their reliability, for this several theories have arisen in the past three centuries, and hundreds of scholars and researchers who are searching in the Gospels as a book, away from being sacred and protected by the churches from criticism, and one of the most famous scholar in this time is Professor Bart Ehrman, and the most famous theories are the theory of  "two-source hypothesis" and the Q theory, from German: Quelle, meaning "source" and the theory of interdependence (sometimes known as utilization).
The following are the most important Gospels which recently discovered:
1 - Gospel of Peter, its manuscript goes back to the second century, and was discovered in Egypt in 1887 in Akhmim, begins with the trial of Jesus and ends with his appearance to the disciples at Lake Tiberias.
2 - Gospel of Truth, which goes back to the second century, was discovered in Egypt in Nag Hammadi, and talks about the crucifixion of Jesus and declaring the truth of Jesus' father on the cross.
3 - Gospel of Marcion also called the Gospel of the Lord, talks about the trial and crucifixion of Jesus as it is written in the four Gospels.
4 - The Wisdom of Jesus Christ or The Sophia of Jesus Christ, was discovered in Egypt in Nag Hammadi, it talks about Jesus after his resurrection from the tomb.
5 - Gospel of Philip, was discovered in Egypt in Nag Hammadi, and it talks about the crucifixion of Jesus.
6 - Gospel of James, also known as the Infancy Gospel of James, or the Protoevangelium of James, was discovered in Nag Hammadi, and it talks about the crucifixion of Jesus, and that anyone who does not believe in the crucifixion of Jesus will not be saved!
7 - Gospel of Nicodemus, is divided into two parts; Part I: is known as the "Acts of Pilate"; Part II is called "Christ's Descent into Hell".
8 - Gospel of Thomas, which begins with the following paragraph "And He said, "Whoever finds the interpretation of these sayings will not experience death", then begins to list many words of Jesus which are mostly consistent with the words of the four Gospels.
9 - Gospel of Judas Iscariot, was discovered in Egypt, and published in the United States a few years ago.
One of the most important notes on these manuscripts and other manuscripts is that they all agree to consider Jesus as a god and the son of God, and that he was crucified and died and rose from the dead, which indicates that those authors were believing in Jesus as the churches believe in him, in general.
Hence, I say that the Gospels themselves were the major problem that faced the churches.
For all this, the four Gospels have been discussed and criticized in an attempt to reach the reality of their existence, and their sources, especially that there is no Gospel which was attributed to Jesus directly.
Yet, in spite of all research, studies and efforts of hundreds of scholars and researchers, with my appreciation to them, they could not reach to a clear result of the sources of the Gospels and the true story of Jesus, or in other words, the historical Jesus, and this could be attributed to the fact that the researchers and the scholars have not paid more attention to some important facts including the following facts:
The first fact is the quite lack of knowledge of the sects that have emerged throughout history, which had believed in the Christ as a prophet and did not have any divine attributes, such as the Arians, one of the greatest sects that has followed Arius, which was controlled the most of the world in ancient times, and had seized control of the church of Rome, the church of Constantinople, the church of Alexandria, church of Jerusalem and other cities, and remained until the seventh century. This sect, and the rest of the sects, despite their spread and their strength, the churches were able to hide all or most of their beliefs and their books. Hence, we cannot find the story of Jesus from their point of view, or the reality of their beliefs in Jesus, except what is written about them in the books of the Church’s Fathers!
This ignorance of these sects made scholars and researchers lose the most important sources that can help them to know the true story of Jesus and the approach and the way of writing the four Gospels, and the purpose of writing them.
The second fact is the comparison between the principles of the Gospels and the principles of the Old Testament, because if the principles are similar, it indicates that they are from the same source, otherwise they will be from different sources!
The third fact is the examination of the true meaning of the word or term gospel and its uses in the New Testament, and the purpose of writing the Gospels, because the understanding of the true meaning of any term or title and its uses in a book may lead to knowing and discovering the sources of this book.
The fourth fact is the Gospels authors' relationship with the texts of the Old Testament, and studying the texts that have been cited in the Gospels from the Old Testament, and comparing them with the original texts of the Old Testament, as well as comparing them with what is written in the Gospels about Jesus, both in terms of his life and attributes, and the other figures of the Gospels, or the historical events.
The search for the sources of the Gospels, away from these facts, and considering that the four Gospels as historical books, that recorded the life of Jesus, raised and raises a lot of questions about the credibility and the reality of them.
The existence of dozens of differences and contradictions and errors among them, even in the Synoptic Gospels themselves, as well as with the Gospel of John, from the genealogy of Jesus, the entry into Jerusalem riding on a donkey and a colt or on a colt only, and his last words on the cross, or how he appeared to the disciples, to the epilogues of the Gospels, etc.; make a lot of researchers and scholars question the existence of Jesus himself as a historical person.
As well as, all the attempts to find the sources of the Gospels through the examination of manuscripts themselves and comparing them with each other to reach the original copies of the Gospels; unfortunately, did not lead to the full truth about their sources, and the way of writing them; and this made many researchers and scholars declare that it is impossible to access the original copies of the Gospel, or to the truth of the Christ historically.
Hence, my approach or my way in this book is to examine the Gospels through the previous facts, excluding the first fact, of course, because nothing change about it yet, to solve and clarify the following issues:
1 - Have the Gospels been written through the revelation and the inspiration of the Holy Spirit or not?
2 - What is the relationship between the Gospels authors and the Old Testament, both in the principles and the texts?
3 - Have the Gospels been written according to the historical events that have been seen by eyewitnesses or have been heard through reliable sources or not?
4 - What are the reasons of all the differences and errors and contradictions that were mentioned in the Gospels, both in the versions or the manuscripts?

Nader Isa